Showing posts with label Funny. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Funny. Show all posts

3/23/2021

5 Other Fabrics to Celebrate like the Flag


Some people say that they should bring back the death penalty because if there's another Jack the Ripper, he should be hung. And I really have to object to that on the grounds of being pedantic here, because the word should actually be Flag the Ripper. He's only Jack The Ripper if he's hung at sea.


A little joke to be appreciated by the flag fuckers there, a market I'd love to break into.

This week Conservative MP James Wild asked the BBC's Director General Tim Davie how many Union Flags were shown in the graphics inside the BBC's annual performance report. Then revealed, much to the shock of...maybe if we're being generous the organisers of last night at the proms but realistically no one, that it was in fact zero. There were zero pictures of the Union Flag in the BBC's performance report.

So while James Wild MP, or Wild James as I imagine he's called at parties, is bringing this to the attention of the masses, I thought I would implore him to raise the case of other omissions from the BBC Annual Review, so here are

5 Other Fabrics Overlooked by the BBC Review

1. Thomas the Tank Engine Duvet Covers

Did you know the BBC report does not contain a single image of a Thomas the Tank Engine duvet cover (inc. related pillow set). Now this may surprise you to learn but back in the period of 1989-1999 when I was a child, we had Thomas the Tank Engine duvet covers almost every other week, with the rest of the time being taken up with Winnie The Pooh. Since 2008, so all my adult life, I have never once slept beneath a Thomas the Tank Engine Duvet cover. Now my choices are limited to white, yellow and with flowers. And it's not until someone points this out that you realise how few Thomas the Tank Engine duvet covers you've slept under recently. When the number of qualified Fat Controllers in this country starts to fall, I think we'll know what's to blame.

2. Y-Fronts

In recent years boxer shorts and hipster pants have become the cradle of choice for the British scrotum but at what cost? The support offered by the Y-Front has all but disappeared from British culture as a result of a direct cultural attack from America. Not one superhero in the MCU wears Y-Fronts, which was once a staple of the genre. And what's more in this day and age of Covid, it's always a decent idea to wear undergarments you can quickly whip off in an alley behind Sainsbury's and wear as a plausible face mask when you nip out having forgotten yours.

3. Hawaiian Shirts

Red, White and Blue? Well it's a start I guess, but Hawaiian shirts are the ultimate accessory no man should be without. Stand out from the crowd - not a crowd of your own friends, you may find you have quite few, but crowds in general. The term peacocking refers to a man trying to impress a lady, but these days it usually just means chinos and a haircut that you saw on The Only Way Is Essex. That's not how peacocks do it. Display your range of colours. Worried your child might get lost on a beach? Not if they're wearing a hawaiian shirt you won't be. Power cut? While everyone else is searching for candles you're lighting up the room with your own luminescent glow.

4. Hot Towels in planes and Indian restaurants

At the end of a delicious curry there's nothing quite so satisfying as sucking on a slice of orange and dabbing your head with a hot towel. I love a curry but I would honestly say it's one of the best bits. The food is over. The little hoover that looks like a blackboard rubber has been run across the table and sucked up any stray bits of rice. The table cloth is carefully picked up, folded and taken away to reveal a second table cloth that was underneath the whole time! Is this table cloth one that will only know the embrace of the hot towels and the bill or will it one day be sullied by Jalfrezi sauce too? Nobody knows. Maybe there is no table, maybe it's just an increasing arrangement of intricately folded table cloths supporting themselves. Then the hot towels come over. All individually wrapped in planet killing plastic. How are they wrapped up? They can't be single use. Which means that they must be sent back somewhere to be resoaked and wrapped again. Like poking a bruise, cricket or the female orgasm the process is a baffling mystery to us all, but the euphoria is unreal. Also they're on planes but the food is shit so they're less good.

5. The Safety Curtain

When it comes to disasters in the theatre - and I'm talking disasters in the literal sense here not Thriller the Michael Jackson musical - the insurance firm Direct Line has calculated that almost all risks of disasters: fires, intruders, terrorist acts, murders, floods and the like, occur in theatres approximately one minute into the interval and last approximately 30 seconds, and so having a defensive shield made of extra strong asbestos that can be lowered down, just for those crucial seconds has probably saved the lives of so many of our great actors. Patrick Stewart, Ian McKellen, Judi Dench, Joe Pasqualie and Helen Mirren are all still here today because of the power of the safety curtain. Of course fringe venues can go fuck themselves. It's not even a legal requirement for those to have doors, seats or any kind of window or air conditioning below 80 decibels. But our West End stars are safe for that crucial 30 seconds every night.

And now back to flags:

The clip of James Wild MP talking to the BBC DG is well worth watching, it's basically a guy convinced he's cottoned onto the one insightful point that's going to bring down the Beeb making that point to a guy who doesn't even really know why it's a question. It's like arguing the government should be disbanded because the Chilcott report into the Iraq war doesn't feature any cat gifs.

And Wild James (PM?) says that his constituents would expect to see "more than one" union flag in an industry report, which is really surprising. I can honestly say that I don't know how many company's accounts, staffing contracts, health and safety audits or risk assessments have a Union Flag in them, but like Tony Davie predicting where the question was going...I could take a guess.

The Union Flag has become an increasingly common symbol across British politics in recent years. Boris Johnson announces lockdowns in front of two of them, and his new press briefing room has four (I think that makes him more patriotic than someone with 3 but fucked if he ever comes up against someone with a string of bunting). Sir Keir Starmer, has announced intentions to win back voters - after he was shockingly exposed by the Daily Mail as the kind of fucker who owns a sanctuary for sick donkeys - by "wrapping the party in the flag" and a leaked report said the Labour party would "make use of the flag, veterans and dressing smartly."  

Now all of this has blown up around the BBC over the last week since housing secretary Robert Jenrick appeared on the news with a perfectly natural Union Jack and Portrait of the Queen hanging above his sofa.


Which is perfectly normal isn't it? I mean unless the dude was Alf Garnett it's hardly a normal thing - side note: people often say "you couldn't make it up" but in this case if the flag and Queen portrait had been written into an old British sitcom it probably wouldn't get repeated today or appear on Britbox, but that's a whole other issue.

The point is some people - traitors, commies, scum and that - don't have union flags beside their sofa and a portrait of the Queen. This was commented on by BBC Breakfast presenter Charlie Stayt, who made fun of the flag a bit. So naturally his co-host Naga Munchetty received widespread abuse on Twitter. Now who knows why Naga Munchetty received more abuse that Charlie. I'm not saying there might be a link between people who get really upset over a joke about a flag and racists, but that's because they're exactly the same people most of the time.


Look, the Union Flag sends out a message. The background of that zoom call is as carefully curated as all these book-shelves of Stephen Hawking and Oxford Classics books that have been shipping in to MPs homes to replace 50 Shades, Mills and Boon erotica and Oswald Mosley's memoirs. And there's nothing wrong with curating your zoom background, but in a world of politics obsessed with authenticity anything that feels like it might be done for show is going to get rightly called out. And you can't deny the Union Flag and a picture of the Queen is a choice, and it's a powerful symbol of Britishness while actually being fairly weak on substance. It's like the free T-Shirt I got from Macmillan Cancer Support, it looks good, it wins me brownie points in the eyes of certain people I might want to impress, but in itself it's a pretty meaningless distraction from the fact that I didn't donate to Comic Relief this year.


This isn't about patriotism by the way. I'm all for waving a flag around at the last night of the proms while singing about all the countries whose resources we pillaged and people's we enslaved. Ok, the "reasonable paragraph" hasn't got off to the best of starts but, no, people should be proud of where they are from, and having a pride or love for your national symbol is not an inherently bad thing (it does lead to some people's unwillingness to discuss some of the uncomfortable failings of this country which is a problem, but patriotism itself isn't really an issue).

What I'm complaining about it more the faux-shows of patriotism to score political points while doing very little. And trust me, I should know, I'm a leftie. Oh we are the best at half arsed slogans. There's a sticker someone stuck on a lamp post near where I live that says "No-one is illegal." To which I added my own important caveat "except Bank Robbers" bank robbers are illegal. Now the original point of that sticker (one about immigration) is a fair and valid one but the slogan itself is fairly meaningless. And that's what's happening here, figures right across the board of politics have adopted the Union Flag as a means of saying "Look how much I care about Britain" and a certain type of nationalist and patriotic people have gone "yeah, anyone without a flag is a traitor!" But the politician isn't actually doing anything to show they care for Britain. They're not making the world a better place. They're not making meaningful change. It's like a restaurant being accused of having a dirty kitchen and you go back in the next week and they've changed the colours of the napkins to red, white and blue. It's a pretty empty gesture that does nothing to put things right.


Meanwhile because it's the ultimate symbol of Britishness if anyone questions it, or asks them what they're doing to make Britain better they can be shut down as being "unpatriotic" as if that's a crime or as if liking the flag is the only way to be patriotic, when a better way might be to knock the futile gestures on the head and improve the country for everyone.  


When Boris Johnson makes those lockdown speeches in front of flags the subtext is partly that he's speaking for the country but also that criticising the content of those briefings is an attack on your country and not "pulling together". When Keir Starmer focuses on flags and "dressing smartly" it's about presenting an image but if there's nothing there to back it up, the image is fairly pointless. It's dumb political symbols not smart political policy, and as an aside, "dressing smartly" is an odd choice. Most politicians dress reasonably smartly anyway, and anyone who saw Dominic Cummings give evidence to a select committee in a smart shirt, or do his big garden press conference knows why he doesn't dress like that more often. He looks really weird.

It's also part of a wider thing right now. The last year has really seen us reckon with our past. Statues have been torn down, statues which themselves are symbols of British history. Heritage sites have put more honest and open accounts of some of the unpleasant things that happened in the country's past on little plaques and then been told by the government that it's an infringement on their free speech to be allowed to express whatever they know to be true. One of the smartest scientists the planet will ever produce (for he's not been born yet) Lt Commander Data in Star Trek: First Contact said "believing oneself to be perfect is often the product of a delusional mind," and questioning our past and our symbols is an important part of that. Fly the flag by all means, just don't let it become the thing that matters. Don't become America. David Mitchell once said on Mock The Week that the difference between Americans and the English is that Americans give a massive shit about their flag being burnt, while British people would react "You paid for it, so it's your flag, you're burning your own flag!" So lets stop focussing on the symbols and go away and google all the bad stuff that James Wild doesn't want us to notice the government is up to.

That said, I do think siding with these flag people is the best way to get The Goodies repeated on the BBC...so Rule Britannia



2/25/2021

Who Wants To Buy My Flat?

This morning, I received a lovely letter from Haart estate agents, just one of a number of estate agents who, apparently, have a load of people just waiting to buy my flat. (Or indeed any flat in my area, they're not picky).

We get letters like this fairly often, from a whole load of estate agents in the area.

So after receiving such a lovely letter, and after forgiving them for the direct approach, I felt it was a only nice to write back. 


Hi there

Thank you for your recent letter about the successful sale of a flat on our street. Congratulations on the sale and the “good price” you got for it. It’s lovely to hear from you about your good day at work. I had a decent day too. Finally caught up on Wandavision, wrote a pub quiz for zoom and briefly opened a word document in which I wrote the title The Red Moss, which will be the title of my hit literary novel just as soon as I have an idea what it means.

Anyway, if you’ll forgive the direct approach. You have a nice office right? I’ve seen it. It’s lovely. There’s a load of people who out there who would love to work in your office. Accountants and legal firms and that. And your office is great. Were it not for you selfishly working there!

Would you mind not working there so I can give it to someone else to work there? That would be really useful for me. Come on, move out, pack up and let someone else have a go. Quit hogging your home guys! There’s people out there who want it.

Yours faithfully

 

Dan Vine
Sarcastic Guy

 

PS. I noticed in your letter that you had buyers looking to buy my flat. Please let me know who, I might sell it to them if they turn out to be really nice. But my policy on my home is – and this might seem a little racist – I will not sell to hypothetical people. I’ve had enough of hypothetical people! You notice they never tell you their names. Imagine how annoyed my neighbours would be if someone hypothetical moved into our flat. “Are they alive or dead?” “Well as long as they stay in the box room, unobserved, they’re actually both until someone opens the door to the box room.”

Bloody hypothetical people, coming over here, behaving however is necessary to make the point I want to make to win the argument.

If you have a non-hypothetical buyer in mind, send me over some details and how much they’re willing to pay for the flat – I hope it’s more than the one down the street, you had to market that and everything but it seems like someone is actively searching for mine – and we’ll do business.

Otherwise, and please forgive me for the direct approach, they'll just have to wait until we move out and put the flat on the market. Tell them (and I appreciate it's not you saying this but these rude people out there eyeing up my flat) my home is my home and not just some commodity I will be made feel guilty for living in by some person who may or may not even exist.

No hypothetical people, or metaphorical pets.


3/29/2018

MAN DEVELOPS REPETATIVE STRAIN INJURY AFTER TAPPING ‘NEXT PAGE’ ON CLICKBAIT STORY


Frank Davies claims that as his day started he hadn’t even thought about 1999 teen romantic comedy She’s All That once this century.

But when one journalistic website offered him the chance to see what the cast of She’s All That looked like now, Mr Davies said “I just had to know.

“I knew that it would be unbelievable, because it said it would right there in the link to the article, so how could it not be?”

Upon clicking the link, Mr Davies was disappointed to discover simply a picture of what Freddie Thingy and The-Woman-Whose-Name-He’d-Forgotten looked like on the original VHS cover. After scrolling past the image and several adverts, he found hope for more with a ‘next page’ button.

Mr Davies pushed the button only to find a brief summary of the film’s plot, and all of the same adverts again. After closing the large advert that covered the majority of the page, he uncovered another ‘next page’ button.

The following page just contained the same advert multiple times over and a ‘next page’ button. “By now, my interest in what they looked like now was well and truly piqued. This was a mystery I had to get to the bottom of,” said Mr Davies. “Of course, it occurred to me I could have just googled it at any point in the last eighteen years, but I was too deep now,” he said so he clicked a ‘next page’ button again only to find a brief and factually inaccurate summary of Rachael Leigh Cook’s career outside of the film.

Mr Davies first became aware it was a problem when his wife returned from work to find him glassy-eyed and tapping at an iPhone whose battery had long since died. Mrs Davies took the iPhone from his hand and lead him to bed. Only to find his hands doing the same series of motions in his sleep.

“It was the perfect pattern,” she said, “Close the pop-up, scroll, click next, close the pop-up, scroll, click next.”

A statement on New-Media Advertising Corp website reads, “There’s one simple change that you can make to rid your life of clickbait.

“The simple change takes just two minutes [read more].”

The cast of She’s All That look around two decades older than they did at the time of the movie.

Image result for she's all thatImage result for freddie prinze jr nowImage result for Rachael Leigh Cook now

1/08/2017

17 Pictures That Make Sarah Vine Weep

Happy New Year! Traditionally a time for resolutions, diets, a few drinks and for the Mail to start it's new slut-shaming cycle.

This year started with Sarah Vine - no relation, or certainly not one we invited over for Christmas - getting overly emotional and weeping for the youth, because some people got drunk. And not just any people: Women!

Look, the Daily Mail gets called out for being racist every day, but it works equally hard at it's sexism and that deserves recognition. Because Sarah Vine is weeping for young women, and yet somehow this appears to be the least sympathetic and most Daily Mail thing I have read in a long time. Sarah Vine has condensed it down to just 17 images of women that make her weep for Britain, I initially thought it was 18 but the little photo of herself looking miserable turned out to be her byline. They should probably have told all their writers they were doing it so they smiled. Anywhoo... let the great 2017 slut shaming begin!



Here's the 17 photos that make Sarah Vine weep and their Daily Mail captions.



Barefoot & Sodden are an indie duo touring university towns



Cause for laughter? One girl is bloodied, but another finds it amusing
Caption supplied by the Daily Mail Haiku department


"Too Much" It's just too much! Beyond the pale! 
It's all fun and games until someone flashes 20% of a single butt cheek. 
What has Nottingham come to?


This man has been "seized" by a woman!
I don't think in all my student days or single days, I was ever seized
It's not a good night, unless you get seized.
I want to dance with somebody, wanna feel the heat with somebody, wanna be seized by somebody.
Seriously? I don't think anyone has used the word 'seized' to describe a drunk person falling into them since 1902


Piggy Backs make Sarah Vine despair by exactly the same degree as women passed out on park benches or receiving care from an ambulance crew


One of these girls is weary.
The other isn't wearying very much at all.
Weary. Wear-y. Wear. See what they --- see what they did there
The guy who realised Health & Safety sounded like 'Elf & Safety was on form after a Christmas break



This woman has fallen over. What is the world coming to?

VIOLENCE
I love the emphasis on the fact he's T-Shirted.
I mean that's an under garment surely? If a gentleman is going out for the night he must surely wear a shirt over his T-Shirt, and a tie, a cravat, a jacket and an over coat.
What would Queen Victoria say if she could see this?

A reveller enjoying New Year's Eve. The cunt.

But there is a serious side to this. Remember this girl with the tiny cut on her knee.
The Mail wouldn't simply be using this as an excuse to attack young people and women, two groups they definitely don't despise. There's an important message.
How will the NHS cope? That lass fell over! I know the government are doing what they can to close down the NHS but surely they could cope?
Perhaps the Mail just couldn't get the images of people with genuine life threatening injuries or photos internal organ damage, so they just chose these pictures of people out enjoying themselves and hoped it would serve as a warning and generate some sympathy. They're probably outraged that so many of their readers have chosen to judge the people in these pictures.

As always there are bigger issues than just some ladies drinking prosecco from a bottle and it wouldn't be the Daily Mail if it didn't at this point explain why the whole of feminism is a terrible failed experiment:

These girls live in a post-feminist society that tells them anything a man can do, they can do better.
Well clearly that's not the case. Just look at those statistics. The number of alcohol related deaths among women has risen by 1,500 in the last 22 years.
Clearly they can't do anything a man can do better, because there's no statistics for how many men have died from alcohol related deaths so clearly that's not happening at all.
If that woman fell in front of the kings horse today, the Daily Mail would have a photo where you could see her pants and a caption that reads "fucking hell love, sort yourself out."

This couldn't be more fucking Daily Mail, grumpy old man sitting in the corner ranting about young people if it tried. 
Not unless it started with "In My Day..." and blamed it all on some modern technology it doesn't understand and hasn't tried.
Since the invention of Uber - the very first ever public transport service in the world - these things are only getting worse.
Of course it's Uber's fault. Why? Because 1) It's new. 2) We tossed a coin and it was heads, tails was Pokemon Go. New things: aren't they so much worse than old things?

Sarah Vine sadly doesn't offer us any sensible suggestions for how to solve this so it's over to A Thompson of bath, in the comments section to come up with a sensible suggestion
Yes. Yes. That is definitely what they should have done.
In the above comment "parents, boss etc can see her like that," etc means a.thompson of Bath.

SEIZED?!

9/16/2016

Pointless Immigrants

Theresa May and David Davis have announced that Britain will not be adopting the Australian style points based immigration system. Whether it's because after months of debate they realised that system was originally created to encourage immigration not curtail it, or whether it's because it's foreign - and therefore terrible - is unclear. May and Davis did have an alternative system that was sure to prove popular with the British public. The new system is the complete opposite of the Australian system. May and Davis have unveiled the Pointless based Immigration System. I used the I Heard It Through The Dan Vine's annual investigative journalism budget to see a film at cineworld, but I did manage to get a transcript from border control where the system is being trialled. Transcript below.

ALEXANDER:         Hello and welcome to Pointless Immigrants, the gameshow where we’re always striving to find the most desirable people to enter the UK. Before the show we asked a sample of the British public to name the types of people they hated and the reasons the country was going to the dogs. Of course the aim of the game is to find those all important Pointless answers, those skills and people that nobody can find any objection to. Now yesterdays contestants won the jackpot so we start off today with a prize of six years before you can use the NHS and a council house in Stevenage. Right lets play Pointless.
Round 1 is jobs. We gave 100 people 100 seconds to name as many kinds of undesirable professions as they could and remember you’re looking for the answer none of our 100 people object to. Contestant 1 what’s your profession?
CONTESTANT 1:    I’m a doctor
ALEXANDER:         You say doctor. Let’s see if you’re right and how many people said doctor.
SOUND:                 POINTLESS COLUMN DESCENDING
ALEXANDER:         Not bad. 3 points for doctors. Richard?
RICHARD:              Yes, doctors are one of the more desirable professions to have in the country aren’t they? But there’s still some people uncomfortable taking their trousers down in front of a foreign doctor.
CONTESTANT 1:    I should say I’m a junior doctor
SOUND:                  WRONG ANSWER.
RICHARD:              Oh, that’s best left unsaid right now.
ALEXANDER:         Contestant Number 2?
CONTESTANT 2:    I’m a footballer coming to play for an English club for millions of pounds, which will probably end up back in my home country.
ALEXANDER:         Foreign footballers, let’s see if it’s right and how many people said footballers.
SOUND:                  POINTLESS COLUMN DESCENDING. POINTLESS ANSWER. APPLAUSE
ALEXANDER:         Congratulations thats a Pointless answer which means you’re one step closer to being granted entry into the UK. Richard?
RICHARD:              Yes foreign footballers a Pointless answer. Often the most high profile immigrants of all but nobody really thinks about them that way. Strange that.
ALEXANDER:         Very good indeed. Contestant 3. What do you do for a living?
CONTESTANT 3:   Well following a similar trail of thought to the last guy, I'm a tennis player?
ALEXANDER:         Tennis player?
SOUND:                 POINTLESS COLUMN DESCENDING
ALEXANDER:          15 points, Richard?
RICHARD:               Yes, that's actually the lowest you can get if you're a tennis player.
ALEXANDER:        Very good indeed. Contestant 4, what do you do for a living?
CONTESTANT 4:   I work in the kitchens at Byron Burger
SOUND:                 POINTLESS COLUMN DESCENDING. POINTLESS ANSWER. WILD APPLAUSE
ALEXANDER:          Pointless answer. Richard?
RICHARD:               Not necessarily someone you'd expect to be top of the list, but since they were shown on the news that time, people really got behind them. Someone gave a quote to a newspaper saying "yes, we want immigrants kicked out and sent back to war-torn hellholes but we don't want to see it or think about it or be reminded that they're real people."

ALEXANDER:         Very good indeed. Round 2 is people. We gave 100 people, 100 seconds to name the kind of people they don’t want coming over here. What kind of people are you? Contestant 1, what kind of person are you?
CONTESTANT 1:    Er...Human being.
SOUND:                 POINTLESS COLUMN DESCENDING.
ALEXANDER:         97 for human being
RICHARD:              Yes, that’s just not good enough for some people. Human beings cost money to look after you know. More than dogs.
ALEXANDER:         Very good indeed. Contestant 2, what kind of person are you?
CONTESTANT 2:    A child.
SOUND:                 POINTLESS COLUMN DESCENDING.
ALEXANDER:         75 for child.
RICHARD:              A bit more sympathy than for an adult but people prefer not to be reminded of you.
ALEXANDER:         Very good indeed. Contestant 3?
CONTESTANT 3:    A child who has been seen on the news?
SOUND:                 POINTLESS COLUMN DESCENDING.
ALEXANDER:         5 for child on the news. Richard?
RICHARD:              Yes, the public love you, but will very quickly forget you.
ALEXANDER:         Very good indeed. Contestant 4?
CONTESTANT 4:    A child who was on the news being held by a celebrity who visited the camp?
SOUND:                 POINTLESS COLUMN DESCENDING. POINTLESS ANSWER. APPLAUSE.
ALEXANDER:         Pointless answer! Which brings you one step closer to that council house in Stevenage. Richard?
RICHARD:              We love a celebrity don’t we?
ALEXANDER:         Don’t we just. Round 3 is language. We gave 100 people 100 seconds to name as many undesirable languages to hear in this country. Contestant 1?
CONTESTANT 1:    I speak English.
ALEXANDER:         Speaking English, let’s see if it’s right and if it is how many people said English.
SOUND:                 POINTLESS COLUMN DESCENDING.
ALEXANDER:         5 points for English. Richard?
RICHARD:              Yes. A very good answer there. Most people say they’re happy for immigrants to come over here as long as they speak English don’t they, but it seems like a percentage of people are just using it as an excuse.
ALEXANDER:         Very good indeed. Contestant 2?
RICHARD:              I use emoji’s.
ALEXANDER:         Emoji’s. Let’s see if its right and how many people said Emojis.
SOUND:                 POINTLESS COLUMN DESCENDING.
ALEXANDER:         87 for Emoji users. Richard?
RICHARD:              :(
ALEXANDER:         Very good indeed. Contestant 3?
RICHARD:              I speak Eton Slang?
ALEXANDER:         Eton Slang. Let’s see if it’s right and how many people said Eton Slang.
SOUND:                 POINTLESS COLUMN DESCENDING.
ALEXANDER:         98 for Eton slang. Richard?
RICHARD:              Yes, 98 out of 100 people said Eton slang was absolutely undesirable in Theresa May and David Davis’s poll. Incidentally Theresa May and David Davis took the poll to test it, so...I’m not saying we know who the two people are but...
ALEXANDER:         Very good indeed. Contestant 4?
CONTESTANT 4:    Well since English has gone. I’m gonna say Welsh.
SOUND:                 WRONG ANSWER
ALEXANDER:         Oh no! Wrong answer. Richard?
RICHARD:              Yes. Welsh not a real language I’m afraid. What you may have seen is a plate of alphabetti spaghetti that’s all Welsh is.
ALEXANDER:         Very good indeed. Round 4 is words. We gave 100 people, 100 seconds to name as many words and phrases they hate hearing, remember your job is to find the Pointless answers that none of them objected to. Contestant 1?
CONTESTANT 1:    This is one the young people use, Bae.
ALEXANDER:         You’re saying Bae. Let’s see if you’re right and how many people said Bae.
SOUND:                 POINTLESS COLUMN DESCENDING.
ALEXANDER:         98 for Bae. Richard?
RICHARD:              Yes, not a popular word amongst some people. Again I think the two people were probably Theresa and David.
ALEXANDER:         Very good indeed. Contestant 2?
CONTESTANT 2:    I’ll go with the phrase, ‘I can see both sides of the argument’
ALEXANDER:         I can see both sides of the argument, is it right, and how many people said it?
SOUND:                 WRONG ANSWER
ALEXANDER:         Oh no! Richard?
RICHARD:              ‘I can see both sides of the argument,’ not something that comes up in immigration discussions ever I’m afraid.
ALEXANDER:         Very good indeed. Contestant 3?
CONTESTANT 3:    I know the difference between specifically/pacifically and expresso/espresso
ALEXANDER:         Sounds good to me, if it’s right I suspect this will be very desirable. Let’s see if it’s right and how many people said it.
SOUND:                 POINTLESS COLUMN DESCENDING.
ALEXANDER:         Ouch. 1 point. Richard?
RICHARD:              Yes, it is very annoying when people get those wrong, but also for some really annoying being corrected on it.
ALEXANDER:         Very good indeed. Contestant 4, what word of phrase do you think the British people like to hear?
CONTESTANT 4:    Bake Off will be exactly the same on Channel 4.
ALEXANDER:         Bake Off will be exactly the same on Channel 4. Let’s see if it’s right and how many people said Bake Off will be exactly the same on Channel 4.
SOUND:                 POINTLESS COLUMN ASCENDING.
ALEXANDER:         Well, that’s the first time the column has ever gone up. 200 points. Richard?
RICHARD:              Yes. It just won't.
ALEXANDER:         Very good indeed. The final round is reasons for coming. In this round all you need to do is score a Pointless answer and you win UK citizenship and a council house in Stevenage. We gave 100 people, 100 seconds to name as many objectionable reasons for coming to the UK as they could. You just need one Pointless answer in this round, that being a reason to come to the UK that no-one objected too. Contestant 1?
CONTESTANT 1:    To work
ALEXANDER:         To work. Let’s see if it’s right and how many people said to work.
SOUND:                 POINTLESS COLUMN DESCENDING.
ALEXANDER:         82 for ‘to work.’ Richard?
RICHARD:              Yes. People don’t like the idea of you stealing their jobs. Even though the 100 people we phoned up were all home during the daytime. Odd.
ALEXANDER:         Very good indeed. Contestant 2?
CONTESTANT 2:    Fleeing a warzone.
ALEXANDER:         Fleeing a warzone, let’s see if it’s right and how many people said Fleeing a warzone.
SOUND:                 POINTLESS COLUMN DESCENDING.
ALEXANDER:         54 for fleeing a warzone. Richard?
RICHARD:              Yes. People say it’s sad and that but we didn’t start it, except in the places where we did start it.
ALEXANDER:         Very good indeed. Contestant 3?
CONTESTANT 3:    I’m dying from a debilitating and awful disease and I believe the NHS can cure me.
ALEXANDER:         NHS treatment. Let’s see if it’s right and how many people said it.
SOUND:                 POINTLESS COLUMN DESCENDING.
ALEXANDER:         93 very high score for NHS treatment. Richard?
RICHARD:              Yes people really don’t like the idea of healing the sick and ending suffering if it costs them money.
ALEXANDER:         Contestant 4?
CONTESTANT 4:    I’m dying from a debilitating and awful disease and I believe Noel Edmonds and his magic box of positive energy can cure me.
ALEXANDER:         Noel Edmonds' magical box of positive energy. Let’s see if you’re right and how many people said Noel Edmonds
SOUND:                 POINTLESS COLUMN DESCENDING.
ALEXANDER:         65 for Noel Edmonds healing power. Richard?
RICHARD:              Yes more popular than NHS treatment, I think because tax payers don’t have to cover it, but still the public think we have too many Noel Edmonds fans already
ALEXANDER:         Well, I’m sorry to say that you don’t win the UK citizenship but you do get to go back to your war torn homeland with a highly coveted Pointless trophy. Goodbye